Online Course Discussion Forum

II-A Number Theory 3.28

 
 
WuZeyin的头像
II-A Number Theory 3.28
WuZeyin - 2021年11月15日 Monday 04:53
 

Shouldn’t we show that the condition that the two odd primes must be consecutive is unnecessary? However, the question let us show that it is necessary.

 
LensmireJohn的头像
Re: II-A Number Theory 3.28
LensmireJohn - 2021年11月15日 Monday 11:31
 

By "necessary" here we mean that we want to help explore why the statement:

  • "If p and q are consecutive odd primes, then p+q has at least 3 factors in its prime factorization" is always true,

but the statement

  • "If p and q are odd primes, then p+q has at least 3 factors in its prime factorization" is NOT always true.

Hence, it's necessary that we have consecutive primes for this statement to be always true.

Hope this helps!

WuZeyin的头像
回复: Re: II-A Number Theory 3.28
WuZeyin - 2021年11月16日 Tuesday 14:48
 

So we can have one positive and one negative prime number they are not consecutive? E.g. -3 and 5 sums 2 which only has two factors. Is this a counterexample?

LensmireJohn的头像
Re: 回复: Re: II-A Number Theory 3.28
LensmireJohn - 2021年11月17日 Wednesday 13:03
 

Good question!

Typically a prime number is defined as an integer greater than $1$ with only $1$ and itself as factors. Hence, usually we wouldn't talk about a number like $-3$ being prime or not being prime.

Thus, while you are correct that $-3+5=2$ has only two factors, we wouldn't consider $-3$ a prime number.

WuZeyin的头像
回复: Re: II-A Number Theory 3.28
WuZeyin - 2021年11月26日 Friday 02:01
 

If we cannot choose a negative integer, then why is the statement below false? What is a counterexample?

  • "If p and q are odd primes, then p+q has at least 3 factors in its prime factorization" is NOT always true.
Thanks Sir!
LensmireJohn的头像
Re: 回复: Re: II-A Number Theory 3.28
LensmireJohn - 2021年11月29日 Monday 13:21
 

Sorry for the confusion, let me try to summarize the results a little bit for clarity.

  1. The statement "If p and q are consecutive odd primes, then p+q has at least 3 factors in its prime factorization" is true (for any values of p and q). This is Example 3.8.
  2. If we remove the word "consecutive" to get the statement "If p and q are odd primes, then p+q has at least 3 factors in its prime factorization", then this statement is false for some values of p and q. Of course if p and q are consecutive this is true, but, if p = 3 and q = 7, for example, 3+7=10 = 2*5 only has two primes in it's prime factorization.

Note we are only need one counterexample here. Others do exist, like p = 3 and q = 11 (with p+q=14=2*7), but sometimes there are at least 3 factors in the prime factorization even if p and q are not consecutive. For example, p = 5 and q = 11 with p+q = 16=2*2*2*2 has 4 factors in it's prime factorization.

Hope this helps a little!